Home Contact Sitemap Jobs Help
 
 (0)
[i]
Publications & Services
Books
Journals
Reference Works
CD Roms
Advanced Search
Rights & Permissions
Customer Information
Alerting Services
News
Online Publications
Author Gateway
Brill Corporate
Our Imprints
BRILL
Hotei Publishing
IDC
Martinus Nijhoff Publishers
VSP
International Law on Peacekeeping
A Study of Article 40 of the UN Charter
Hitoshi Nasu

Books
Available
Publication year: 2009

ISBN-13 (i)The ISBN (International Standard Book Number) has been changed from 10 to 13 digits on 1 January 2007:978 90 04 17226 5
ISBN-10:90 04 17226 2
 
Cover:Hardback
Number of pages:xlviii, 324 pp.
 
List price:€ 130.00 / US$ 208.00

Table of contents
About the author(s)
 

It is generally considered that the UN Security Council has been galvanised since the end of the Cold War. However, the existence and development of armed conflicts remain the reality in the international scene. Is the upsurge in instances of invoking Chapter VII of the UN Charter truly a sign of the invigoration of the Security Council’s authority or mere evidence of its failure to prevent the aggravation of armed conflicts? To what extent is the Security Council authorised to exercise the peacekeeping power in order to take a more flexible approach to conflict management from an earlier stage of conflict?
This book explores the potential of the UN peacekeeping power, placing Article 40 of the UN Charter at the centre of the legal regime governing peacekeeping measures. It traces the origins of peacekeeping measures primarily in the experience of the League of Nations and identifies Article 40 of the Charter as the primary legal basis for, and the legal restraints upon, the exercise of the peacekeeping power. It examines the regulatory framework within which the United Nations, particularly the Security Council, is authorised and may even be required to direct peacekeeping measures to prevent the aggravation of armed conflicts. It suggests that the legal accountability of the Security Council in directing peacekeeping measures will be enhanced by utilising procedural mechanisms for self-regulation

© 2006 Brill Disclaimer