Home Contact Sitemap Jobs Help
 
 (0)
[i]
Publications & Services
Books
Journals
Reference Works
CD Roms
Advanced Search
Rights & Permissions
Customer Information
Alerting Services
News
Online Publications
Author Gateway
Brill Corporate
Our Imprints
BRILL
Hotei Publishing
IDC
Martinus Nijhoff Publishers
VSP
International Review of Pragmatics

Journals

ISSN:1877-3095
E-ISSN:1877-3109
 
Current:Volume 1 (2009)
Number of Issues:2
List price Individuals:€ 52.00 / US$ 77.00
List price Institutions:€ 155.00 / US$ 229.00
List price institutions online only:€ 140.00 / US$ 206.00

About the editor(s)
About the editors
Piotr Cap (Ph.D. in Linguistics, 1996) is Professor of Linguistics at the University of Lodz, Poland. His interests are in pragmatics, discourse analysis, political linguistics, business communication and methodology of linguistic research.

Bruce Fraser received his Ph.D. in Linguistics from MIT and is Professor of Linguistics and Education at Boston University. His primary research interests are in pragmatics (discourse markers, politeness), discourse analysis (political discourse), and forensic linguistics.

Robert M. Harnish received his Ph.D. in Philosophy and Linguistics (MIT, USA) and is Professor of Philosophy and of Linguistics at the University of Arizona, Tucson. His main research interests are in pragmatics (speech act and implicature theory), early analytic philosophy, and cognitive science.

Marina Terkourafi (PhD Cambridge, 2002) is Assistant Professor of Linguistics at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. She specializes in post-Gricean pragmatics and (im)politeness theories; additionally, she has research interests in historical and computational pragmatics, cognitive linguistics, and the sociolinguistics of Greek.

Ken Turner is Principal Lecturer in Linguistics and Philosophy in the School of Humanities at the University of Brighton. He is co-editor of Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface and is interested in the semantics and pragmatics of conditionals, modals, temporal expressions, anaphoric relations and definite and indefinite descriptions (amongst other expressions).
Editorial Board
Editorial Board:

Emma Borg, Reading, UK
Robyn Carston, London, UK
Rachel Giora, Israel
Yueguo Gu, Beijing, China
Napoleon Katsos, Cambridge, UK
Mikhail Kissine, Brussels, Belgium
Eliza Kitis, Thessaloniki, Greece
Dennis Kurzon, Haifa, Israel
Brigitte Nerlich, Nottingham, UK
Neal R. Norrick, Saarbrücken, Germany
Jaroslav Peregrin, Prague, Czech Republic
Gunter Senft, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
Robert J. Stainton, London, Ontario, Canada
Iwona Witczak-Plisiecka, Lodz, Poland
Ruth Wodak, Lancaster, UK
Abstracting & Indexing
Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts
Instructions for Author(s)
Readership
Researchers in pragmatics, discourse analysis, cognitive linguistics, corpus linguistics, sociolinguistics, philosophy of language, general linguistics.

Go to Online Edition (new window)

International Review of Pragmatics (IRP) is a new peer-reviewed international journal committed to publishing excellent research in the area of pragmatics and related disciplines pertaining to all aspects of human communication, verbal and non-verbal. It aims to provide a comprehensive and authoritative picture of the field, encouraging submissions rooted in different conceptions and perspectives originating in geographically diverse areas. IRP publishes original papers as well as review articles. While subscribing to the general view that all meaning is necessarily contextual, IRP welcomes research reflecting different, often conflicting, views of pragmatics. It is a forum for papers seeing pragmatics as a controlling perspective on language and communication studied across a number of disciplines (syntax, semantics, etc.), but also for those which consider pragmatics itself a separate discipline defined by specific objects of investigation (deixis, implicature, etc.). The confrontation is supposed to establish how much explanatory power in pragmatics rests in its interdisciplinary and semiotics-based variations, as opposed to self-contained methodologies with precisely delineated scope of application. Thus, in the long run, the aim of IRP will be to maintain a vigorous debate leading to crystallization of the core concept of pragmatics, and to evaluation of its descriptive and interpretive capacity.

© 2006 Brill Disclaimer